Le génocide, la France et la liberté d’expression

Translate here (somewhat accurately).

Aujourd’hui en France, le Parlement a adopté une nouvelle proposition qui pénalise la négation des génocides qui sont officiellement reconnus par le gouvernement français. (Il y en a deux : la Shoah et le génocide arménien en 1915.)

Cette proposition a bien sûr ses opposants, surtout les Turcs qui habitent la France. Les Turcs ne croient pas que la violence contre les Arméniens était un génocide. D’après eux, c’était simplement une conséquence de la Première Guerre mondiale.

C’est clair que les morts de 600 000 à 1 500 000 sont horribles, mais je vois un autre problème : la liberté d’expression. En France, il était déjà interdit de nier la Shoah. Après l’adoption de cette loi, il sera interdit de nier un autre avis, une autre idée : que les morts arméniennes ne constituent pas un génocide.

Moi, je pense que ces interdictions sont effrayantes. Aux États-Unis, nos mots et nos avis sont bien libres. Nous pouvons nier la violence, l’histoire, etc., sans sanction. Mais en France, la liberté d’expression devient de plus en plus limitée. Je pense que c’est étrange pour un pays qui nous a donné la Déclaration des droits de l’homme, un document qui dit : “Nul ne doit être inquiété pour ses opinions, même religieuses, pourvu que leur manifestation ne trouble pas l’ordre public établi par la Loi.”

Pensez : Qu’est-ce qui se passe si quelqu’un nie l’génocide arménien ? C’est un avis, tout simplement. Un avis ne change pas les faits du passé ! Les fous, laissez-les être fous.

La liberté d’expression est le plus important des droits de l’homme, et on doit être prudent avec ses limites. Aujourd’hui, un gouvernement dit qu’on ne peut pas être en désaccord au sujet d’un génocide. Demain, c’est possible un gouvernement dirait qu’on doit être en accord au sujet de la science, de la religion, de la guerre ou des autres idées.

Ce jour-là : C’est la fin.

The new Top 25: final rankings

I’m trying a new NCAA football ranking system. You can read about it here.

Congratulations to the Oklahoma State Cowboys for winning its first national title!

English: Oklahoma State University Athletics logo

Image via Wikipedia

Final rankings

  1. Oklahoma State (12-1)
  2. Alabama (12-1) +1
  3. LSU (13-1) -1
  4. TCU (11-2)
  5. West Virginia (10-3) +14
  6. USC (10-2)
  7. Oklahoma (10-3)
  8. Oregon (12-2) +9
  9. Arkansas (11-2)
  10. Texas A&M (7-6) +
  11. Michigan State (11-3) +
  12. Utah (8-5) +
  13. Stanford (11-2)
  14. Baylor (10-3)
  15. Kansas State (10-3)
  16. Florida State (9-4) +
  17. Wisconsin (11-3) -9
  18. Auburn (8-5)
  19. Clemson (10-4) -14
  20. Missouri (8-5)
  21. South Carolina (11-2) +
  22. North Carolina State (8-5) +
  23. Michigan (11-2)
  24. Texas (8-5)
  25. Louisiana Monroe (4-8)
Dropped from rankings: Northwestern, 10; Georgia, 11; Georgia Tech, 12; Notre Dame, 16; Nebraska, 21; Louisville, 22.

Part of a balanced breakfast

I’m trying to eat better. I didn’t eat badly before—at least, not since grad school, when Taco Bell was study food—but I’m trying to raise the bar even higher. In practice, this boils down to a few guidelines:

  • Avoiding fast food, even the “healthy” stuff;
  • Choosing organic or natural when there’s an option (and it’s financially feasible);
  • Increasing my intake of vegetables and fruit; and
  • Avoiding processed foods.

This hasn’t been all that difficult, save for one meal: breakfast. I need suggestions of quick breakfast foods that follow at least some of the above guidelines. Thoughts?

You can keep your Passion

Passion 2012, a conference targeted toward evangelical Christians, is going on now in Atlanta. I’m not there. In fact, I’ve never been to a Passion conference. And I’m OK with that.

That said, I’ve been to my fair share of conferences geared toward evangelicals. When I was a teenager, I attended praise rallies and youth camps on a regular basis. They’re standard fare in the evangelical community. All of that ended when I was a sophomore in high school. I spent my second year at a college week at LifeWay’s Glorieta Conference Center, in New Mexico. That’s when I realized I couldn’t handle conferences such as that anymore.

For those who haven’t been to one of these sorts of events, let me provide a description: Thousands of similarly aged people pack a room that’s far too small for them. After a brief welcome, a praise-and-worship band begins to play, surrounded by state-of-the-art multimedia technology. For a while, it’s a rock concert. The band goes through some classics, as well as some stuff they’ve been working on for the new album. The audience belts out the lyrics as they read them on the HD projections that they see on the walls. People sway with their arms in the air and tears in their eyes. Some are on the floor, kneeling or lying prostrate. After about a half hour, it ends with a prayer. The lights come up, and people find their seats.

“You can be the generation that changes the world!” (or something similar) says the preacher who comes up after the band leaves the stage.

The crowd cheers, and some shout, “Amen.”

At this point, the preacher launches into an hour-long sermon about clinging to the “Truth,” despite all those who try to dissuade. He throws in a little theology and a heavy dose of apologetics and always ends the sermon by challenging the audience to repent of whatever sins have taken over their lives. (More often than not, those are sex, drugs and alcohol.) The band comes back and plays another half-hour set while audience members line the aisles, embracing each other and crying.

It’s the same script, year after year. That was the scene at Glorieta, and, based on this promo video, this year’s Passion conference is no different.

Feeding the addiction

The environment at one of these conferences is one of pure, unadulterated emotion. Everything—from the throbbing subwoofer to the flashing lights—is calculated to elicit the maximum amount of emotional response from the audience. I know this from personal experience: I’ve run sound and lights at small events. I could make people cry with the flip of a switch.

In that way, such events are like drugs: The right combination of ingredients brings about a certain physiological response. And just like a high, it’s temporary. Once the conference-goer gets home, the feeling ebbs, and everything’s back to how it was before.

Well, almost everything. That much pure emotion is intoxicating, and once it’s gone, it leaves a void. So the user goes back, chasing the high once again.

A positive solution

I’m of the opinion that emotionally driven conferences such as Passion and the ones that I’ve attended are destructive to the church. As I mentioned above, they create and feed a feelings-based faith, one that’s big on emotion but generally superficial.

That’s not to say those who participate in them are bad. I think they mean well, but I also think they don’t understand the consequences of their actions. Conferences such as these communicate a lopsided view of Christianity, one that places an inordinate amount of emphasis on “feeling” God. That’s not sustainable, and it leads, in my experience, to painful—and sometimes faith-shattering—withdrawal.

Instead of spending money and time on inwardly focused, emotionally driven conferences, the community of Christ should look outward. We shouldn’t be trying to attract people with flashy lights and trendy music, we should be going to those who are in need, with open arms. We shouldn’t be looking for the next spiritual high, we should be building relationships with Christians and non-Christians and, in the process, developing a deeply rooted faith in God.

2011 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2011 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

The concert hall at the Syndey Opera House holds 2,700 people. This blog was viewed about 12,000 times in 2011. If it were a concert at Sydney Opera House, it would take about 4 sold-out performances for that many people to see it.

Click here to see the complete report.

New Year’s resolution for North Texans: Think outside the car

My column in yesterday’s Fort Worth Star-Telegram:

It’s Boxing Day, which, in the United States, generally consists of three things: starting diets, returning unwanted gifts and making a list of resolutions for the new year.

In that spirit, I’d like to suggest a resolution for all North Texans to consider: Think outside the car.

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/12/25/3618109/wooddell-new-years-resolution.html

Happy Christmas to all

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Isaiah 9:6 KJV
May your Christmas be one of great joy.

I’m sick of Tim Tebow, and it’s not Tim Tebow’s fault

English: Tim Tebow, a player on the Denver Bro...

Image via Wikipedia

I’ve never met Tim Tebow, but I have every reason to believe that he’s a good man. He’s charitable, he’s congenial, and he seems like he has a great heart. And let’s not forget, he does win football games from time to time.

I’m sick of him, though. No, it’s not because of his conspicuous Christianity. Our theologies (based on what I’ve seen) are often different, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. In fact, my feelings about Tebow aren’t really his fault.

American evangelical Christians are famous for its deification of celebrities. To be honest, who could blame them? There are so few outspoken Christians in the entertainment and sports worlds that when one is discovered, he or she is lauded is a hero. This week, it’s Tebow. A few years ago, we had Kurt Warner, Tony Dungy and, for a while, Bono. Robert Duvall was très chic in the 1990s, and until his meltdown, Mel Gibson was praised for asserting his faith in Hollywood.

Those same evangelical Christians are famous for something else: eating their own. Remember what happened to Bono? He referred to his 2003 Grammy award as ”really, really fucking brilliant!” and was instantly shunned. When Mel Gibson started on his spiral downward, the response from the evangelicals wasn’t one of loving restoration, it was one of condemnation. This came but a few months after congregations were playing host to screening of his “The Passion of the Christ.”

I fear this will happen to Tebow. Right now, the evangelical world—and even the nonreligious one—is elevating Tebow to outrageous heights. We’re sharing videos of his singing praise songs during games. We’re “tebowing” around the world. We’re sending Tebow cards to our friends and neighbors. We’re fawning all over him.

What happens when he falls? What happens if he drops an f-bomb on the field, right in front of a parabolic mic? What happens if he drinks a little too much at a party? Those who are elevating him as a resplendent example of Christianity will keep upping the ante. What happens if he doesn’t endorse the right (or any) candidate or if he doesn’t take exactly the right stance on same-sex marriage, abortion or other hot-button issues?

At some point, Tebow is going to make a mistake, and when he does, his biggest champions are going to go after him like wolves. He’ll be condemned and treated as a traitor to the faith. And while he’s busy trying to recover, his supporters-turned-critics will move on to the next big thing, starting the cycle again.

I’m sick of Tebow because I’m sick of this ridiculous merry-go-round. We should be impressed by Tebow’s passion and his outspoken nature, and we should celebrate his fantastic performance on the gridiron, but we need to stop elevating him to such levels. He doesn’t deserve the fallout that will likely ensue should he fall.

The new Top 25: Week 15

I’m trying a new NCAA football ranking system. You can read about it here.

This is the final set of rankings until after bowl season.

Week 15

  1. Oklahoma State (11-1) +6
  2. LSU (13-0)
  3. Alabama (11-1)
  4. TCU (10-2)
  5. Clemson (10-3) +
  6. USC (10-2)
  7. Oklahoma (9-3) -6
  8. Wisconsin (11-2) +
  9. Arkansas (10-2)
  10. Northwestern (6-6)
  11. Georgia (10-3)
  12. Georgia Tech (8-4)
  13. Stanford (11-1)
  14. Baylor (9-3)
  15. Kansas State (10-2)
  16. Notre Dame (8-4)
  17. Oregon (11-2)
  18. Auburn (7-5)
  19. West Virginia (9-3)
  20. Missouri (7-5)
  21. Nebraska (9-3)
  22. Louisville (7-5)
  23. Michigan (10-2)
  24. Texas (7-5)
  25. Louisiana Monroe (4-8) +
Dropped from rankings: Virginia Tech, 5; Michigan State, 8; Florida Atlantic, 25

The new Top 25: Week 14

I’m trying a new NCAA football ranking system. You can read about it here.

Week 14

  1. Oklahoma (9-2) +
  2. LSU (12-0)
  3. Alabama (11-1)
  4. TCU (9-2)
  5. Virginia Tech (11-1)
  6. USC (10-2)
  7. Oklahoma State (10-1)
  8. Michigan State (10-2) +2
  9. Arkansas (10-2)
  10. Northwestern (6-6) -2
  11. Georgia (10-2) +1
  12. Georgia Tech (8-4) -1
  13. Stanford (11-1)
  14. Baylor (8-3)
  15. Kansas State (9-2)
  16. Notre Dame (8-4)
  17. Oregon (10-2)
  18. Auburn (7-5)
  19. West Virginia (8-3) +
  20. Missouri (7-5)
  21. Nebraska (9-3) +
  22. Louisville (7-5)
  23. Michigan (10-2)
  24. Texas (7-4)
  25. Florida Atlantic (1-10) +
Dropped from rankings: Iowa State, 1; Pittsburgh, 19; Iowa, 21; UAB, 25